Search for: All records

Phenological indices are an effective approach for assessing spatial and temporal patterns and variability in plant development. The Spring Indices (SI-x), two widely adopted phenological indices, have been used in recent decades to predict development of woody plants, and document changes in spring growth timing, especially in North America. However, these two indices (Leaf and Bloom) capture only two “moments” in the continuum of spring when quantities of thermal or photo/thermal energy, associated with seasonal events in plants, are accumulated, limiting their utility to characterize the remainder of the spring season. Further, the Spring Indices do not account for intraspecific variation, limiting their ability to reflect non-cloned plant development. To address these shortcomings, we developed a novel suite of phenological indices that encompass a broader span of the spring season. These indices were constructed using observations contributed to the USA National Phenology Network’s Nature’s Notebook platform across many non-cloned tree and shrub species’ ranges, thereby incorporating differing regional responses within species due to genetic variations. Individual species model predictions of leaf or bloom timing exhibited an average mean absolute error of 8.55 days; most were improved by the inclusion of site-specific latitude, elevation, or 30-year average temperature. Leaf and bloom model outputs for individual species across the spring season were temporally aggregated into four leaf and bloom groups to produce a suite of Spring Development Indices (SDI). Accuracy of the SDI predictionswas 0.89 days lower, on average, than the species models, but 2.65 days better than SI-x. Generally, all SDIs were highly correlated. The SDIs exhibiting the most difference from the others were Early leaf, Very Early bloom, and Late bloom. As such, these SDIs provide novel insights, beyond SI-x, into the relative timing of spring-season “moments” across species in space and time. 

Observational and modeling studies indicate significant changes in the global hydroclimate in the twentieth and early twenty-first centuries due to anthropogenic climate change. In this review, we analyze the recent literature on the observed changes in hydroclimate attributable to anthropogenic forcing, the physical and biological mechanisms underlying those changes, and the advantages and limitations of current detection and attribution methods. Changes in the magnitude and spatial patterns of precipitation minus evaporation (P–E) are consistent with increased water vapor content driven by higher temperatures. While thermodynamics explains most of the observed changes, the contribution of dynamics is not yet well constrained, especially at regional and local scales, due to limitations in observations and climate models. Anthropogenic climate change has also increased the severity and likelihood of contemporaneous droughts in southwestern North America, southwestern South America, the Mediterranean, and the Caribbean. An increased frequency of extreme precipitation events and shifts in phenology has also been attributed to anthropogenic climate change. While considerable uncertainties persist on the role of plant physiology in modulating hydroclimate and vice versa, emerging evidence indicates that increased canopy water demand and longer growing seasons negate the water-saving effects from increased water-use efficiency. 

Abstract We investigated the predictability (forecast skill) of short-term droughts using the Palmer drought severity index (PDSI). We incorporated a sophisticated data training (of decadal range) to evaluate the improvement of forecast skill of short-term droughts (3 months). We investigated whether the data training of the synthetic North American Multi-Model Ensemble (NMME) climate has some influence on enhancing short-term drought predictability. The central elements are the merged information among PDSI and NMME with two postprocessing techniques. 1) The bias correction–spatial disaggregation (BC-SD) method improves spatial resolution by using a refined soil information introduced in the available water capacity of the PDSI calculation to assess water deficit that better estimates drought variability. 2) The ensemble model output statistic (EMOS) approach includes systematically trained decadal information of the multimodel ensemble simulations. Skill of drought forecasting improves when using EMOS, but BC-SD does not increase the forecast skill when compared with an analysis using BC (low spatial resolution). This study suggests that predictability forecast of drought (PDSI) can be extended without any change in the core dynamics of the model but instead by using the sophisticated EMOS postprocessing technique. We pointed out that using NMME without any postprocessing is of limited use in the suite of model variations of the NMME, at least for the U.S. Northeast. From our analysis, 1 month is the most extended range we should expect, which is below the range of the seasonal scale presented with EMOS (2 months). Thus, we propose a new design of drought forecasts that explicitly includes the multimodel ensemble signal. 

Droughts of the future are likely to be more frequent, severe, and longer lasting than they have been in recent decades, but drought risks will be lower if greenhouse gas emissions are cut aggressively. This review presents a synopsis of the tools required for understanding the statistics, physics, and dynamics of drought and its causes in a historical context. Although these tools have been applied most extensively in the United States, Europe, and the Amazon region, they have not been as widely used in other drought-prone regions throughout the rest of the world, presenting opportunities for future research. Water resource managers, early career scientists, and veteran drought researchers will likely see opportunities to improve our understanding of drought. 

Abstract Climate models consistently project a significant drying in the Caribbean during climate change, and between 2013 and 2016 the region experienced the worst multiyear drought in the historical period. Although dynamical mechanisms have been proposed to explain drought in the Caribbean, the contributions from mass convergence and advection to precipitation minus evaporation ( P − E ) anomalies during drought are unknown. Here we analyze the dynamics of contemporaneous droughts in the Caribbean by decomposing the contributions of mass convergence and advection to P − E using observational and simulated data. We find that droughts arise from an anomalous subsidence over the southeastern Caribbean and northeastern South America. Although the contributions from mass convergence and advection vary across the region, it is mass convergence that is the main driver of drought in our study area. A similar dynamical pattern is observed in simulated droughts using the Community Earth System Model (CESM) Large Ensemble (LENS).